Everyday News Update

South African President Jacob Zuma survives no-confidence vote by Parliament – Washington Post

South African President Jacob Zuma survived a parliamentary vote Tuesday that could have pushed him from office, hanging onto sufficient backing within his African National Congress amid growing claims of corruption and worries about a stumbling economy.

It was the sixth time Zuma has ridden out a no-confidence vote since becoming president in 2009. The outcome further reinforced the dual images that have taken shape as he has beaten back challenge after challenge over the years.

To supporters, Zuma is a steady hand and political patriarch needed to keep the country in balance. Among critics, he has been portrayed as a crafty strongman who can muzzle internal party dissent and continually manage to choke off the opposition.

Tuesday’s vote marked the first time that Parliament members were allowed to vote anonymously on whether to keep in him power. Still, the outcome was the same as the previous bids to oust him, as the ANC core refused to splinter.

Zuma’s ANC dominates Parliament with 249 out of 400 seats, and his opponents needed at least 50 party members to defect — something that has never happened before in a party that defeated South Africa’s apartheid system and is known for its loyalty.

In the end, however, more than two dozen ANC members voted against Zuma to make it the closest the opposition has come to forcing him out.

The motion was went down 198 to 177, said the Parliament speaker, Baleka Mbete. Nine lawmakers abstained, and the remainder did not vote.

The results of the vote were announced after a full day of debate, voting and ballot counting. Zuma’s term is set to run until elections in 2019.

But opposition to Zuma’s rule has been growing amid revelations of corruption and influence peddling. In addition, the economy has faltered and unemployment has remained stubbornly high in a country marked by deep inequalities of wealth.

Zuma had been in tight spots before. In the first no-confidence vote in 2010, Zuma was accused of being unfit for office. Other votes were held on accusations that included suspected illegal improvements to his home, mismanagement of the economy and his failure in 2015 to arrest visiting Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court.

In a debate before Tuesday’s vote, Zuma’s supporters said his ouster could send the country into a leadership crisis. His critics told fellow lawmakers that it was a moment to take a stand.

“Take our country back,” said Mmusi Maimane, head of the main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance.

Speaker of Parliament Mbete shocked South Africans on Monday when she announced her decision to allow the vote to proceed on a secret ballot, which allowed party members to vote against their leader outside the public spotlight.

“I understand and accept that a motion of no confidence in the president is a very important matter, a potent tool toward holding the president to account,” she said at a press briefing Monday in Cape Town.

The no-confidence vote, she said, “constitutes one of the severest political consequences imaginable,” and her decision to allow the vote to proceed anonymously was “about putting the resilience of our democratic institution to test.”

In June, South Africa’s Constitutional Court empowered Mbete to decide whether to allow a secret ballot. A small opposition party, the United Democratic Movement, called for the vote.

“Voting in favor of this motion will be tantamount to throwing a nuclear bomb at our country,” said the ANC’s chief whip in Parliament, Jackson Mthembu. His statement was issued before the ruling on the secret ballot.

It was the first test of the president since he purged his cabinet in March. Among those fired was Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan, who remains a member of Parliament and indicated he would break ranks with the ANC and vote to remove Zuma from office.

The firing of the internationally popular Gordhan had immediate effects on the economy, with credit ratings agencies Fitch and S&P Global Ratings downgrading South Africa to junk status. They cited political uncertainty in their reviews of the country’s creditworthiness.

The ANC’s alliance partners, the South African Communist Party and COSATU, a coalition of trade unions, told Zuma to quit. A group of anti-apartheid veterans also asked the president to resign.

Especially damaging to Zuma has been a string of embarrassing, leaked emails showing his tight relationship with a controversial, industrialist family, the Guptas. The family has reportedly handpicked cabinet ministers and officials to fill Zuma’s government.

“What you have is a private family actually setting up the institutions of government such that they’re the ones that make the decisions about how the country is running,” said Cathy Powell, a law professor at the University of Cape Town.

On Monday, South Africa’s statistician general announced that unemployment remained at 27.7 percent.

Brian Murphy in Washington contributed to this report.

South African President Jacob Zuma survives no-confidence vote by Parliament – Washington Post

Leave a Reply

Featured Links

    Search Archive

    Search by Date
    Search by Category
    Search with Google

    Photo Gallery

    @2012 Designed By Quick News Update